Skip Navigation

Research Spotlight



Nanotoxicology: Exposing hidden dangers

by Roma Subramanian

From drug delivery systems to cosmetics, the science of nanotechnology has a wide range of applications. This science is based on the unusual properties that materials exhibit when their dimensions are reduced to the nanoscale, that is, to less than 100 nanometers (which is 1000 times smaller than the width of a human hair). For example, while inert at normal scales, gold nanoparticles are catalytically active and are being used to improve the performance of fuel cells. Further, unlike its bulk form, zinc oxide nanoparticles have better UV blocking properties, making them ideal for use in sunscreens.

(From left to right) Michael Berg, Aishwarya Sooresh, Dr. Christie Sayes, Nivedita Banerjee, and Amelia Romoser make up the research team studying nanoparticles

(From left to right) Michael Berg, Aishwarya Sooresh, Dr. Christie Sayes, Nivedita Banerjee, and Amelia Romoser make up the research team studying nanoparticles.

While the unique properties of nanoparticles are being exploited to generate a range of products, questions about the potential toxicity of these particles have not been adequately addressed. For example, how do nanoparticles incorporated into food matrices to increase longevity and freshness affect the immune system? How does inhaling an aerosolized mixture of nanoparticles affect the lungs?

Such questions are the focus of Dr. Christie Sayes' research at the Texas A&M University College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences. Sayes, an assistant professor in the department of Veterinary Physiology & Pharmacology, and her research group are at the forefront of a relatively new and rapidly developing field-nanotoxicology.

Toxicity studies

The toxic effects of nanoparticles are attributed to their various physicochemical properties, for example, size, surface reactivity, optical and electronic properties, agglomeration state and composition.

"Studies in my laboratory and in the labs I was trained in, as well as the experiences of our collaborators all over the world [have indicated] that nanoparticle exposure results in inflammatory responses [for example, through the generation of reactive oxygen species]," Sayes said. "We've seen membrane oxidation, protein oxidation and even DNA oxidation." In a previous study, Sayes showed that at high concentrations, nanoscale titanium dioxide particles, which are used in solar cells, for example, disrupted the normal activity of human dermal fibroblasts and human lung epithelial cells in culture through oxidative damage. Further, she has shown that depending on their surface reactivity, nanoquartz particles intratracheally instilled in rats produced different degrees of pulmonary inflammation and cytotoxicity. These and other studies conducted by her lab on the biological effects of different types of nanoparticles have helped provide evidence for nanoparticle toxicity.

Currently, Sayes' lab is investigating the mechanisms underlying nanoparticle-induced inflammatory cascades and adverse immune responses.

"Some of the cells in the body look at nanoparticles as antigens, and it's the [resulting] increase in antibody production that's really interesting," Sayes said. "We know that antibodies are recruited, but do antibodies know to bind to nanoparticles to get rid of them? Can macrophages [cells involved in the body's defense response] see nanoparticles and if not, will the particles persist in our body, or will we able to excrete them out?"

A human skin cell exposed to green quantum dots, which preferentially associate with the cell's mitochondria

A human skin cell exposed to green quantum dots, which preferentially associate with the cell's mitochondria.

The lab is also investigating the effect of a nanoparticle's agglomeration state on cytotoxicity. Although nanocrystals, which can be in the form of a powder, tend to agglomerate in water, this agglomeration is not irreversible.

"As nanoparticles move from one compartment of the body to another, they could de- and then reagglomerate," Sayes said. "For example, when an agglomeration of nanoparticles gets immersed in lung surfactant fluid [secreted by lung alveolar cells], you sometimes immediately see a deagglomeration of particles, that is, the particles separate from each other." Since cells appear to treat individual nanoparticles differently from the way they treat nanoparticle agglomerates, Sayes is interested in investigating the differential cellular uptake mechanisms of individual versus aggregated nanoparticles.

A human skin cell exposed to green quantum dots encapsulated in polymer microcapsules. The red stain shows the healthy morphology of the cell by highlighting the cytoplasm

A human skin cell exposed to green quantum dots encapsulated in polymer microcapsules. The red stain shows the healthy morphology of the cell by highlighting the cytoplasm.

Also, in collaboration with Swansea University, UK, Sayes' lab is investigating the toxicological effects of nanoparticles in composited materials. The project will examine whether in a car crash involving car bumpers made of nanomaterial composites, the nanoparticles embedded in the composited material are released and if so, whether they retain their physical and chemical characteristics and what would be the implications for the environment or human health.

Challenges

"The dose makes the poison," is an oft repeated maxim in toxicology. However, the absence of a standardized unit to express the toxic dose of a nanoparticle means that different metrics, for example, nanoparticle number and nanoparticle mass, are used for nanoparticle toxicity. This "dosimetric conundrum," as Sayes refers to it, makes it difficult to compare the results of nanotoxicity studies.

In a recent study, Sayes and her coauthors suggested that because there are few analytical methods currently available to measure nanoparticle mass, nanoparticle number per unit volume be used as a metric for expressing nanoparticle toxicity.

Another challenge in conducting nanotoxicology studies is the lack of correlation between the results of in vitro and in vivo studies. This means that in vitro assays need to be further standardized and validated before they can be used to effectively screen nanomaterials for toxicity.

Developing such in vitro assays would require careful characterization of the properties of the nanoparticles being evaluated as these properties, for example, catalytic activity or high adsorption capacity, might interfere with the results of the assay.

"A detailed and comprehensive physicochemical characterization of the test material being studied...is a critical factor for correlating the nanoparticle surface characteristics with any measured biological/toxicological responses as well as [for providing] an adequate reference point for comparing toxicity results with the hazard-based findings of other investigators," Sayes explained in a paper she recently coauthored, stressing the importance of determining nanoparticle properties.

Other projects and future directions

In addition to studies on nanoparticle toxicity and characterization, Sayes is investigating the use of nanoparticles in drug delivery and diagnostics.

For example, a recent grant to the lab awarded from the Texas AgriLife Research Vector-Borne Disease division will be directed toward using nanoparticles to prevent the toxic effects of pyrethroid pesticides after accidental exposure.

In another study, in collaboration with the university's Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sayes is investigating how quantum dots, nanocrystal semiconductors with fluorescent properties, can be used as biosensors to monitor changes in blood chemistry.

 






Researchers confirm cause of proventricular dilatation disease

by Roma Subramanian

The cause of proventricular dilatation disease (PDD), a fatal neurological disorder that affects mainly captive parrots, is avian bornavirus (ABV). A group led by researchers at the Schubot Exotic Bird Health Center of the Texas A&M University College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences confirmed this revelation in a recent study.

Members of the Schubot research team are (from left) Dr. Patricia Gray, Dr. Itamar Villanueva, and Dr. Paulette Suchodolski

Members of the Schubot research team are (from left) Dr. Patricia Gray, Dr. Itamar Villanueva, and Dr. Paulette Suchodolski.

The study, published in the March 2010 issue of the journal Emerging Infectious Diseases, is based on the fulfillment of Koch's postulates for ABV. The postulates are a set of criteria that must be met to prove that a particular pathogenic agent causes a disease.

First identified in 2008 in birds affected with PDD, ABV has been suggested as the possible cause of this disease. However, thus far, conclusive evidence demonstrating the virus actually causes PDD has not been presented.

Establishing such a causal relationship between ABV and PDD, the researchers explain in the study, would require satisfying Koch's postulates, that is, "isolation of the agent [in this case, ABV] from infected birds; its propagation in culture; and, after reintroduction of the isolate into a susceptible host, manifestation of the disease." The researchers have demonstrated precisely these steps.

The group isolated ABV from the brain tissues of eight parrots with PDD. The virus was then propagated under laboratory conditions; specifically, the virus was grown in a culture of duck embryonic fibroblasts. Fibroblasts infected with the virus were then injected into two PDD-free Patagonian conures. One Patagonian conure was injected with fibroblasts that did not contain the virus.

The two Patagonian conures infected with ABV developed clinical signs of PDD. Further, brain tissues from these birds tested positive for ABV. The conure that was not infected with the virus did not develop PDD.

"It's the final act in proving that the virus actually causes PDD," said Dr. Ian Tizard, director of the Schubot Center and head of the research group, commenting on the successful experimental reproduction of the disease in healthy birds.

A slide of the PDD virus

A slide of the PDD virus.

The study, funded by Texas A&M University's Richard M. Schubot Endowment, represents a major step forward in understanding PDD, a disease that has befuddled scientists for more than 30 years.

 

First reported in the late 1970s, PDD affects more than 50 species of parrots as well as other birds. Many of these species are endangered and are raised in captivity, making PDD a serious threat to their conservation.

The disease is characterized by damage to the nerve supply in the organs in the gastrointestinal tract. This affects the birds' ability to digest food, resulting in the accumulation of undigested food in the proventriculus, the first part of the stomach, which consequently dilates (hence the name of the disease).

Common clinical signs include weight loss, regurgitation of undigested seeds and loss of appetite. PDD can also damage nerves in the brain and spinal cord, resulting in neurological symptoms such as imbalance and lack of coordination. The disease eventually results in death.

Further studies at the Schubot Center will focus on the origin, prevention and treatment of the disease.



↑ Back to Top
« Back to CVM Today